[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130710104114.GF14873@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:41:15 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: EDAC lockdep splat
Forgot to CC him.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:39:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:57:33AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > While debugging an unrelated issue I came across the following lockdep
> > splat:
>
> …
>
> > Jul 10 11:38:00 x4 kernel: BUG: key ffff8802169693f8 not in .data!
> > Jul 10 11:38:00 x4 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > Jul 10 11:38:00 x4 kernel: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at kernel/lockdep.c:2987 lockdep_init_map+0x45e/0x490()
> > Jul 10 11:38:00 x4 kernel: sda: unknown partition table
> > Jul 10 11:38:00 x4 kernel: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1)
>
> I know: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136809709202740&w=2
>
> I was expecting Mauro to fix it since his patches grew this out:
>
> commit 7a623c039075e4ea21648d88133fafa6dcfd113d
> Author: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
> Date: Mon Apr 16 16:41:11 2012 -0300
>
> edac: rewrite the sysfs code to use struct device
>
> adds struct bus_type to struct mem_ctl_info which is dynamically
> allocated and that's why lockdep complains.
>
> bus_register() needs to get a statically allocated struct bus_type as
> the rest of the kernel does it.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists