[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1373468383.14604.41.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:59:43 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware/dmi_scan: Fix most checkpatch errors and
warnings
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 14:28 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Joe,
hi Jean.
> Le Tuesday 09 July 2013 à 09:19 -0700, Joe Perches a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 17:42 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
[]
> > If the function name is used in every printk, it might
> > be better to add
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
[]
> > If not, then I suggest removing the embedded function names
> > and writing these as
> > pr_err("%s: etc...", __func__, etc...);
> > This eliminates any possible function name mismatch.
> I had considered this too, but stepped back after finding out that this
> change would increase the binary size. It's hard to sell such a change
> then when it's only fixing a theoretical problem.
No worries.
Another tiny consideration is that __func__ is both
generally not particularly useful and could in the
future be consolidated via vsprintf/printk having
some extension that uses __builtin_return_address
and sprint_symbol_no_offset.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists