| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130710170205.GA26425@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:02:05 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: turn vma_set_policy() into vma_dup_policy()
Simple cleanup. Every user of vma_set_policy() does the same work,
this looks a bit annoying imho. And the new trivial helper which
does mpol_dup() + vma_set_policy() to simplify the callers.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
include/linux/mempolicy.h | 9 +++++++--
kernel/fork.c | 9 +++------
mm/mempolicy.c | 10 ++++++++++
mm/mmap.c | 17 +++++------------
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
index 0d7df39..b2f8977 100644
--- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ static inline struct mempolicy *mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *pol)
}
#define vma_policy(vma) ((vma)->vm_policy)
-#define vma_set_policy(vma, pol) ((vma)->vm_policy = (pol))
static inline void mpol_get(struct mempolicy *pol)
{
@@ -126,6 +125,7 @@ struct shared_policy {
spinlock_t lock;
};
+int vma_dup_policy(struct vm_area_struct *src, struct vm_area_struct *dst);
void mpol_shared_policy_init(struct shared_policy *sp, struct mempolicy *mpol);
int mpol_set_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *info,
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
@@ -240,7 +240,12 @@ mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long idx)
}
#define vma_policy(vma) NULL
-#define vma_set_policy(vma, pol) do {} while(0)
+
+static inline int
+vma_dup_policy(struct vm_area_struct *src, struct vm_area_struct *dst)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
static inline void numa_policy_init(void)
{
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 987b28a..1c214fe 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -351,7 +351,6 @@ static int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_struct *oldmm)
struct rb_node **rb_link, *rb_parent;
int retval;
unsigned long charge;
- struct mempolicy *pol;
uprobe_start_dup_mmap();
down_write(&oldmm->mmap_sem);
@@ -402,11 +401,9 @@ static int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_struct *oldmm)
goto fail_nomem;
*tmp = *mpnt;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp->anon_vma_chain);
- pol = mpol_dup(vma_policy(mpnt));
- retval = PTR_ERR(pol);
- if (IS_ERR(pol))
+ retval = vma_dup_policy(mpnt, tmp);
+ if (retval)
goto fail_nomem_policy;
- vma_set_policy(tmp, pol);
tmp->vm_mm = mm;
if (anon_vma_fork(tmp, mpnt))
goto fail_nomem_anon_vma_fork;
@@ -474,7 +471,7 @@ out:
uprobe_end_dup_mmap();
return retval;
fail_nomem_anon_vma_fork:
- mpol_put(pol);
+ mpol_put(vma_policy(tmp));
fail_nomem_policy:
kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, tmp);
fail_nomem:
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 4baf12e..6b1d426 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2065,6 +2065,16 @@ retry_cpuset:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_current);
+int vma_dup_policy(struct vm_area_struct *src, struct vm_area_struct *dst)
+{
+ struct mempolicy *pol = mpol_dup(vma_policy(src));
+
+ if (IS_ERR(pol))
+ return PTR_ERR(pol);
+ dst->vm_policy = pol;
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* If mpol_dup() sees current->cpuset == cpuset_being_rebound, then it
* rebinds the mempolicy its copying by calling mpol_rebind_policy()
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 7a1ba76..d8a310b 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2481,7 +2481,6 @@ detach_vmas_to_be_unmapped(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
static int __split_vma(struct mm_struct * mm, struct vm_area_struct * vma,
unsigned long addr, int new_below)
{
- struct mempolicy *pol;
struct vm_area_struct *new;
int err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -2505,12 +2504,9 @@ static int __split_vma(struct mm_struct * mm, struct vm_area_struct * vma,
new->vm_pgoff += ((addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
- pol = mpol_dup(vma_policy(vma));
- if (IS_ERR(pol)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(pol);
+ err = vma_dup_policy(vma, new);
+ if (err)
goto out_free_vma;
- }
- vma_set_policy(new, pol);
if (anon_vma_clone(new, vma))
goto out_free_mpol;
@@ -2538,7 +2534,7 @@ static int __split_vma(struct mm_struct * mm, struct vm_area_struct * vma,
fput(new->vm_file);
unlink_anon_vmas(new);
out_free_mpol:
- mpol_put(pol);
+ mpol_put(vma_policy(new));
out_free_vma:
kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, new);
out_err:
@@ -2881,7 +2877,6 @@ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **vmap,
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
struct vm_area_struct *new_vma, *prev;
struct rb_node **rb_link, *rb_parent;
- struct mempolicy *pol;
bool faulted_in_anon_vma = true;
/*
@@ -2926,10 +2921,8 @@ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **vmap,
new_vma->vm_start = addr;
new_vma->vm_end = addr + len;
new_vma->vm_pgoff = pgoff;
- pol = mpol_dup(vma_policy(vma));
- if (IS_ERR(pol))
+ if (vma_dup_policy(vma, new_vma))
goto out_free_vma;
- vma_set_policy(new_vma, pol);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_vma->anon_vma_chain);
if (anon_vma_clone(new_vma, vma))
goto out_free_mempol;
@@ -2944,7 +2937,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **vmap,
return new_vma;
out_free_mempol:
- mpol_put(pol);
+ mpol_put(vma_policy(new_vma));
out_free_vma:
kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, new_vma);
return NULL;
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists