| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130710181820.GB22430@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:18:20 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>
Cc: khali@...ux-fr.org, swarren@...dotorg.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle IRQ.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:25:38PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
> When the temperature exceed the limit range value,
> the driver can handle the interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> index 2cb7f8e..88ff362 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> /*
> * Addresses to scan
> @@ -179,6 +180,19 @@ enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
> #define LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 (1 << 6) /* 3rd temperature sensor */
> #define LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT (1 << 7) /* Broken alert */
>
> +/* LM90 status */
> +#define LM90_LTHRM (1 << 0) /* local THERM limit tripped */
> +#define LM90_RTHRM (1 << 1) /* remote THERM limit tripped */
> +#define LM90_OPEN (1 << 2) /* remote is an open circuit */
> +#define LM90_RLOW (1 << 3) /* remote low temp limit tripped */
> +#define LM90_RHIGH (1 << 4) /* remote high temp limit tripped */
> +#define LM90_LLOW (1 << 5) /* local low temp limit tripped */
> +#define LM90_LHIGH (1 << 6) /* local high temp limit tripped */
> +#define LM90_BUSY (1 << 7) /* ADC is converting */
> +
> +#define MAX6696_RLOW (1 << 3) /* remote2 low temp limit tripped */
> +#define MAX6696_RHIGH (1 << 4) /* remote2 high temp limit tripped */
> +
> /*
> * Driver data (common to all clients)
> */
> @@ -1423,6 +1437,43 @@ static void lm90_init_client(struct i2c_client *client)
> i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_W_CONFIG1, config);
> }
>
> +static void lm90_alarm_status(struct i2c_client *client,
> + u8 alarms, u8 alarms_max6696)
> +{
If you are introdcing a function to evaluate the alarm status, you might as well
copy the register reads as well as the mask evaluations into this function.
If you don't want to see the "Everything ok" output if nothing is wrong, it can
return a boolean indicating if a status bit was set. This way the calling code
can also more easily determine if it should return IRQ_NONE or IRQ_HANDLED.
> + if (alarms & (LM90_LLOW | LM90_LHIGH | LM90_LTHRM))
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 1);
> + if (alarms & (LM90_RLOW | LM90_RHIGH | LM90_RTHRM))
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 2);
> + if (alarms & LM90_OPEN)
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "temp%d diode open, please check!\n", 2);
> +
> + if (alarms_max6696 & (MAX6696_RLOW | MAX6696_RHIGH))
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 3);
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t lm90_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct lm90_data *data = dev_id;
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(data->hwmon_dev->parent);
> + u8 alarms, alarms_max6696 = 0;
> +
Please stick with alarms2 instead of alarms_max6696 as in the original code.
> + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
> +
> + if (data->kind == max6696)
> + lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &alarms_max6696);
> +
> + if ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (alarms_max6696 & 0xfe) == 0) {
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> + } else {
That else statement is unnecessary.
> + lm90_alarm_status(client, alarms, alarms_max6696);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> @@ -1499,6 +1550,18 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> goto exit_remove_files;
> }
>
> + if (client->irq >= 0) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "lm90 IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
> + err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq,
> + NULL, lm90_irq_thread,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + "lm90", data);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot request interrupt\n");
> + goto exit_remove_files;
> + }
> + }
> +
> return 0;
>
> exit_remove_files:
> @@ -1532,19 +1595,7 @@ static void lm90_alert(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned int flag)
> if ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (alarms2 & 0xfe) == 0) {
> dev_info(&client->dev, "Everything OK\n");
> } else {
> - if (alarms & 0x61)
> - dev_warn(&client->dev,
> - "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 1);
> - if (alarms & 0x1a)
> - dev_warn(&client->dev,
> - "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 2);
> - if (alarms & 0x04)
> - dev_warn(&client->dev,
> - "temp%d diode open, please check!\n", 2);
> -
> - if (alarms2 & 0x18)
> - dev_warn(&client->dev,
> - "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 3);
> + lm90_alarm_status(client, alarms, alarms2);
>
> /*
> * Disable ALERT# output, because these chips don't implement
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists