[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130710215414.GA25959@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:54:14 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Yet more softlockups.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:39:50AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > Something is really fucked up in the kernel side of perf.
> > I get this right after booting..
> >
> > [ 114.516619] perf samples too long (4262 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
> >
> > That's before I even get a chance to log in, so I'm pretty sure perf isn't even being run.
> >
> > And this is just booting up my desktop, not fuzzing.
>
> This is probably related to the problem described in the thread
> perf: fix interrupt handler timing harness
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1520775
> which in theory has a fix. Not sure why it'd trigger during boot.
Bah. That's not it either.
[ 1903.293233] perf samples too long (2514 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
[ 1903.295248] INFO: NMI handler (perf_event_nmi_handler) took too long to run: 19498.002 msecs
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists