| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51DCEA76.9070808@ozlabs.ru>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:00:38 +1000
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
CC: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] KVM: PPC: Add support for multiple-TCE hcalls
On 07/10/2013 03:02 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 07/06/2013 05:07 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> This adds real mode handlers for the H_PUT_TCE_INDIRECT and
>> H_STUFF_TCE hypercalls for QEMU emulated devices such as IBMVIO
>> devices or emulated PCI. These calls allow adding multiple entries
>> (up to 512) into the TCE table in one call which saves time on
>> transition to/from real mode.
>
> We don't mention QEMU explicitly in KVM code usually.
>
>> This adds a tce_tmp cache to kvm_vcpu_arch to save valid TCEs
>> (copied from user and verified) before writing the whole list into
>> the TCE table. This cache will be utilized more in the upcoming
>> VFIO/IOMMU support to continue TCE list processing in the virtual
>> mode in the case if the real mode handler failed for some reason.
>>
>> This adds a guest physical to host real address converter
>> and calls the existing H_PUT_TCE handler. The converting function
>> is going to be fully utilized by upcoming VFIO supporting patches.
>>
>> This also implements the KVM_CAP_PPC_MULTITCE capability,
>> so in order to support the functionality of this patch, QEMU
>> needs to query for this capability and set the "hcall-multi-tce"
>> hypertas property only if the capability is present, otherwise
>> there will be serious performance degradation.
>
> Same as above. But really you're only giving recommendations here. What's
> the point? Please describe what the benefit of this patch is, not what some
> other random subsystem might do with the benefits it brings.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras<paulus@...ba.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy<aik@...abs.ru>
>>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> 2013/07/06:
>> * fixed number of wrong get_page()/put_page() calls
>>
>> 2013/06/27:
>> * fixed clear of BUSY bit in kvmppc_lookup_pte()
>> * H_PUT_TCE_INDIRECT does realmode_get_page() now
>> * KVM_CAP_SPAPR_MULTITCE now depends on CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
>> * updated doc
>>
>> 2013/06/05:
>> * fixed mistype about IBMVIO in the commit message
>> * updated doc and moved it to another section
>> * changed capability number
>>
>> 2013/05/21:
>> * added kvm_vcpu_arch::tce_tmp
>> * removed cleanup if put_indirect failed, instead we do not even start
>> writing to TCE table if we cannot get TCEs from the user and they are
>> invalid
>> * kvmppc_emulated_h_put_tce is split to kvmppc_emulated_put_tce
>> and kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce (for the previous item)
>> * fixed bug with failthrough for H_IPI
>> * removed all get_user() from real mode handlers
>> * kvmppc_lookup_pte() added (instead of making lookup_linux_pte public)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy<aik@...abs.ru>
>> ---
>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 25 +++
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 9 ++
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 16 +-
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c | 260
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 41 ++++-
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 6 +
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr_papr.c | 37 ++++-
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 3 +
>> 9 files changed, 517 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>> b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>> index 6365fef..762c703 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>> @@ -2362,6 +2362,31 @@ calls by the guest for that service will be passed
>> to userspace to be
>> handled.
>>
>>
>> +4.86 KVM_CAP_PPC_MULTITCE
>> +
>> +Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_MULTITCE
>> +Architectures: ppc
>> +Type: vm
>> +
>> +This capability means the kernel is capable of handling hypercalls
>> +H_PUT_TCE_INDIRECT and H_STUFF_TCE without passing those into the user
>> +space. This significanly accelerates DMA operations for PPC KVM guests.
>
> significanly? Please run this through a spell checker.
>
>> +The user space should expect that its handlers for these hypercalls
>
> s/The//
>
>> +are not going to be called.
>
> Is user space guaranteed they will not be called? Or can it still happen?
... if user space previously registered LIOBN in KVM (via
KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE or similar calls).
ok?
There is also KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU but it is not in the kernel yet
and may never get there.
>> +In order to enable H_PUT_TCE_INDIRECT and H_STUFF_TCE use in the guest,
>> +the user space might have to advertise it for the guest. For example,
>> +IBM pSeries guest starts using them if "hcall-multi-tce" is present in
>> +the "ibm,hypertas-functions" device-tree property.
>
> This paragraph describes sPAPR. That's fine, but please document it as
> such. Also please check your grammar.
>> +
>> +Without this capability, only H_PUT_TCE is handled by the kernel and
>> +therefore the use of H_PUT_TCE_INDIRECT and H_STUFF_TCE is not recommended
>> +unless the capability is present as passing hypercalls to the userspace
>> +slows operations a lot.
>> +
>> +Unlike other capabilities of this section, this one is always enabled.
>
> Why? Wouldn't that confuse older user space?
How? Old user space won't check for this capability and won't tell the
guest to use it (via "hcall-multi-tce"). Old H_PUT_TCE is still there.
If the guest always uses H_PUT_TCE_INDIRECT/H_STUFF_TCE no matter what,
then it is its problem - it won't work now anyway as neither QEMU nor host
kernel supports these calls.
>> +
>> +
>> 5. The kvm_run structure
>> ------------------------
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index af326cd..20d04bd 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table {
>> struct kvm *kvm;
>> u64 liobn;
>> u32 window_size;
>> + struct { struct { unsigned long put, indir, stuff; } rm, vm; } stat;
>
> You don't need this.
>
>> struct page *pages[0];
>> };
>>
>> @@ -609,6 +610,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>> spinlock_t tbacct_lock;
>> u64 busy_stolen;
>> u64 busy_preempt;
>> +
>> + unsigned long *tce_tmp_hpas; /* TCE cache for TCE_PUT_INDIRECT
>> hcall */
>> + enum {
>> + TCERM_NONE,
>> + TCERM_GETPAGE,
>> + TCERM_PUTTCE,
>> + TCERM_PUTLIST,
>> + } tce_rm_fail; /* failed stage of request processing */
>> #endif
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>> index a5287fe..fa722a0 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>> @@ -133,8 +133,20 @@ extern int kvmppc_pseries_do_hcall(struct kvm_vcpu
>> *vcpu);
>>
>> extern long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_create_spapr_tce *args);
>> -extern long kvmppc_h_put_tce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long liobn,
>> - unsigned long ioba, unsigned long tce);
>> +extern struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *kvmppc_find_tce_table(
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long liobn);
>> +extern long kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce(unsigned long tce);
>> +extern void kvmppc_emulated_put_tce(struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *tt,
>> + unsigned long ioba, unsigned long tce);
>> +extern long kvmppc_vm_h_put_tce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long liobn, unsigned long ioba,
>> + unsigned long tce);
>> +extern long kvmppc_vm_h_put_tce_indirect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long liobn, unsigned long ioba,
>> + unsigned long tce_list, unsigned long npages);
>> +extern long kvmppc_vm_h_stuff_tce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long liobn, unsigned long ioba,
>> + unsigned long tce_value, unsigned long npages);
>> extern long kvm_vm_ioctl_allocate_rma(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_allocate_rma *rma);
>> extern struct kvmppc_linear_info *kvm_alloc_rma(void);
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
>> index b2d3f3b..99bf4e5 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> *
>> * Copyright 2010 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corp.<paulus@....ibm.com>
>> * Copyright 2011 David Gibson, IBM Corporation<dwg@....ibm.com>
>> + * Copyright 2013 Alexey Kardashevskiy, IBM Corporation<aik@....ibm.com>
>> */
>>
>> #include<linux/types.h>
>> @@ -36,8 +37,10 @@
>> #include<asm/ppc-opcode.h>
>> #include<asm/kvm_host.h>
>> #include<asm/udbg.h>
>> +#include<asm/iommu.h>
>> +#include<asm/tce.h>
>>
>> -#define TCES_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(u64))
>> +#define ERROR_ADDR ((void *)~(unsigned long)0x0)
>>
>> static long kvmppc_stt_npages(unsigned long window_size)
>> {
>> @@ -50,6 +53,20 @@ static void release_spapr_tce_table(struct
>> kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *stt)
>> struct kvm *kvm = stt->kvm;
>> int i;
>>
>> +#define __SV(x) stt->stat.x
>> +#define __SVD(x) (__SV(rm.x)?(__SV(rm.x)-__SV(vm.x)):0)
>> + pr_debug("%s stat for liobn=%llx\n"
>> + "--------------- realmode ----- virtmode ---\n"
>> + "put_tce %10ld %10ld\n"
>> + "put_tce_indir %10ld %10ld\n"
>> + "stuff_tce %10ld %10ld\n",
>> + __func__, stt->liobn,
>> + __SVD(put), __SV(vm.put),
>> + __SVD(indir), __SV(vm.indir),
>> + __SVD(stuff), __SV(vm.stuff));
>> +#undef __SVD
>> +#undef __SV
>
> All of these stat points should just be trace points. You can do the
> statistic gathering from user space then.
>
>> +
>> mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>> list_del(&stt->list);
>> for (i = 0; i< kvmppc_stt_npages(stt->window_size); i++)
>> @@ -148,3 +165,138 @@ fail:
>> }
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +
>> +/* Converts guest physical address to host virtual address */
>> +static void __user *kvmppc_vm_gpa_to_hva_and_get(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> Please don't distinguish _vm versions. They're the normal case. _rm ones
> are the special ones.
>
>> + unsigned long gpa, struct page **pg)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long hva, gfn = gpa>> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>> +
>> + memslot = search_memslots(kvm_memslots(vcpu->kvm), gfn);
>> + if (!memslot)
>> + return ERROR_ADDR;
>> +
>> + hva = __gfn_to_hva_memslot(memslot, gfn) + (gpa& ~PAGE_MASK);
>
> s/+/|/
>
>> +
>> + if (get_user_pages_fast(hva& PAGE_MASK, 1, 0, pg) != 1)
>> + return ERROR_ADDR;
>> +
>> + return (void *) hva;
>> +}
>> +
>> +long kvmppc_vm_h_put_tce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long liobn, unsigned long ioba,
>> + unsigned long tce)
>> +{
>> + long ret;
>> + struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *tt;
>> +
>> + tt = kvmppc_find_tce_table(vcpu, liobn);
>> + /* Didn't find the liobn, put it to userspace */
>
> Unclear comment.
What detail is missing?
>> + if (!tt)
>> + return H_TOO_HARD;
>> +
>> + ++tt->stat.vm.put;
>> +
>> + if (ioba>= tt->window_size)
>> + return H_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> + ret = kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce(tce);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + kvmppc_emulated_put_tce(tt, ioba, tce);
>> +
>> + return H_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +long kvmppc_vm_h_put_tce_indirect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long liobn, unsigned long ioba,
>> + unsigned long tce_list, unsigned long npages)
>> +{
>> + struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *tt;
>> + long i, ret = H_SUCCESS;
>> + unsigned long __user *tces;
>> + struct page *pg = NULL;
>> +
>> + tt = kvmppc_find_tce_table(vcpu, liobn);
>> + /* Didn't find the liobn, put it to userspace */
>> + if (!tt)
>> + return H_TOO_HARD;
>> +
>> + ++tt->stat.vm.indir;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The spec says that the maximum size of the list is 512 TCEs so
>> + * so the whole table addressed resides in 4K page
>
> so so?
>
>> + */
>> + if (npages> 512)
>> + return H_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> + if (tce_list& ~IOMMU_PAGE_MASK)
>> + return H_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> + if ((ioba + (npages<< IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT))> tt->window_size)
>> + return H_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> + tces = kvmppc_vm_gpa_to_hva_and_get(vcpu, tce_list,&pg);
>> + if (tces == ERROR_ADDR)
>> + return H_TOO_HARD;
>> +
>> + if (vcpu->arch.tce_rm_fail == TCERM_PUTLIST)
>> + goto put_list_page_exit;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i< npages; ++i) {
>> + if (get_user(vcpu->arch.tce_tmp_hpas[i], tces + i)) {
>> + ret = H_PARAMETER;
>> + goto put_list_page_exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce(vcpu->arch.tce_tmp_hpas[i]);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto put_list_page_exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i< npages; ++i)
>> + kvmppc_emulated_put_tce(tt, ioba + (i<< IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT),
>> + vcpu->arch.tce_tmp_hpas[i]);
>> +put_list_page_exit:
>> + if (pg)
>> + put_page(pg);
>> +
>> + if (vcpu->arch.tce_rm_fail != TCERM_NONE) {
>> + vcpu->arch.tce_rm_fail = TCERM_NONE;
>> + if (pg&& !PageCompound(pg))
>> + put_page(pg); /* finish pending realmode_put_page() */
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +long kvmppc_vm_h_stuff_tce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long liobn, unsigned long ioba,
>> + unsigned long tce_value, unsigned long npages)
>> +{
>> + struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *tt;
>> + long i, ret;
>> +
>> + tt = kvmppc_find_tce_table(vcpu, liobn);
>> + /* Didn't find the liobn, put it to userspace */
>> + if (!tt)
>> + return H_TOO_HARD;
>> +
>> + ++tt->stat.vm.stuff;
>> +
>> + if ((ioba + (npages<< IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT))> tt->window_size)
>> + return H_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> + ret = kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce(tce_value);
>> + if (ret || (tce_value& (TCE_PCI_WRITE | TCE_PCI_READ)))
>> + return H_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i< npages; ++i, ioba += IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE)
>> + kvmppc_emulated_put_tce(tt, ioba, tce_value);
>> +
>> + return H_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c
>> index 30c2f3b..cd3e6f9 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> *
>> * Copyright 2010 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corp.<paulus@....ibm.com>
>> * Copyright 2011 David Gibson, IBM Corporation<dwg@....ibm.com>
>> + * Copyright 2013 Alexey Kardashevskiy, IBM Corporation<aik@....ibm.com>
>> */
>>
>> #include<linux/types.h>
>> @@ -35,42 +36,243 @@
>> #include<asm/ppc-opcode.h>
>> #include<asm/kvm_host.h>
>> #include<asm/udbg.h>
>> +#include<asm/iommu.h>
>> +#include<asm/tce.h>
>>
>> #define TCES_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(u64))
>> +#define ERROR_ADDR (~(unsigned long)0x0)
>>
>> -/* WARNING: This will be called in real-mode on HV KVM and virtual
>> - * mode on PR KVM
>
> What's wrong with the warning?
It belongs to kvmppc_h_put_tce() which is not called in virtual mode anymore.
It is technically correct for kvmppc_find_tce_table() though. Should I put
this comment before every function which may be called from real and
virtual modes?
>> +/*
>> + * Finds a TCE table descriptor by LIOBN
>> */
>> +struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *kvmppc_find_tce_table(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long liobn)
>> +{
>> + struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *tt;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(tt,&vcpu->kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables, list) {
>> + if (tt->liobn == liobn)
>> + return tt;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_find_tce_table);
>> +
>> +#ifdef DEBUG
>> +/*
>> + * Lets user mode disable realmode handlers by putting big number
>> + * in the bottom value of LIOBN
>
> What? Seriously? Just don't enable the CAP.
It is under DEBUG. It really, really helps to be able to disable real mode
handlers without reboot. Ok, no debug code, I'll remove.
>> + */
>> +#define kvmppc_find_tce_table(a, b) \
>> + ((((b)&0xffff)>10000)?NULL:kvmppc_find_tce_table((a), (b)))
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Validates TCE address.
>> + * At the moment only flags are validated as other checks will
>> significantly slow
>> + * down or can make it even impossible to handle TCE requests in real mode.
>
> What?
What is missing here (besides good english)?
>> + */
>> +long kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce(unsigned long tce)
>
> I don't like the naming scheme. Please turn this around and make it
> kvmppc_tce_validate().
Oh. "Like"... Ok.
>> +{
>> + if (tce& ~(IOMMU_PAGE_MASK | TCE_PCI_WRITE | TCE_PCI_READ))
>> + return H_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> + return H_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce);
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Handles TCE requests for QEMU emulated devices.
>
> We still don't mention QEMU in KVM code. And does it really matter whether
> they're emulated by QEMU? Devices could also be emulated by KVM.
>
>> + * Puts guest TCE values to the table and expects QEMU to convert them
>> + * later in a QEMU device implementation.
>> + * Called in both real and virtual modes.
>> + * Cannot fail so kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce must be called before it.
>> + */
>> +void kvmppc_emulated_put_tce(struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *tt,
>
> kvmppc_tce_put()
>
>> + unsigned long ioba, unsigned long tce)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long idx = ioba>> SPAPR_TCE_SHIFT;
>> + struct page *page;
>> + u64 *tbl;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Note on the use of page_address() in real mode,
>> + *
>> + * It is safe to use page_address() in real mode on ppc64 because
>> + * page_address() is always defined as lowmem_page_address()
>> + * which returns __va(PFN_PHYS(page_to_pfn(page))) which is arithmetial
>> + * operation and does not access page struct.
>> + *
>> + * Theoretically page_address() could be defined different
>> + * but either WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL or HASHED_PAGE_VIRTUAL
>> + * should be enabled.
>> + * WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL is never enabled on ppc32/ppc64,
>> + * HASHED_PAGE_VIRTUAL could be enabled for ppc32 only and only
>> + * if CONFIG_HIGHMEM is defined. As CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>> + * is not expected to be enabled on ppc32, page_address()
>> + * is safe for ppc32 as well.
>> + */
>> +#if defined(HASHED_PAGE_VIRTUAL) || defined(WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL)
>> +#error TODO: fix to avoid page_address() here
>> +#endif
>
> Can you extract the text above, the check and the page_address call into a
> simple wrapper function?
Is this function also too big? Sorry, I do not understand the comment.
>> + page = tt->pages[idx / TCES_PER_PAGE];
>> + tbl = (u64 *)page_address(page);
>> +
>> + /* udbg_printf("tce @ %p\n",&tbl[idx % TCES_PER_PAGE]); */
>
> This is not an RFC, is it?
Any debug code is prohibited? Ok, I'll remove.
>> + tbl[idx % TCES_PER_PAGE] = tce;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_emulated_put_tce);
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV
>> +/*
>> + * Converts guest physical address to host physical address.
>> + * Tries to increase page counter via realmode_get_page() and
>> + * returns ERROR_ADDR if failed.
>> + */
>> +static unsigned long kvmppc_rm_gpa_to_hpa_and_get(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + unsigned long gpa, struct page **pg)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte;
>> + unsigned long hva, hpa = ERROR_ADDR;
>> + unsigned long gfn = gpa>> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + unsigned shift = 0;
>> +
>> + memslot = search_memslots(kvm_memslots(vcpu->kvm), gfn);
>> + if (!memslot)
>> + return ERROR_ADDR;
>> +
>> + hva = __gfn_to_hva_memslot(memslot, gfn);
>> +
>> + ptep = find_linux_pte_or_hugepte(vcpu->arch.pgdir, hva,&shift);
>> + if (!ptep || !pte_present(*ptep))
>> + return ERROR_ADDR;
>> + pte = *ptep;
>> +
>> + if (((gpa& TCE_PCI_WRITE) || pte_write(pte))&& !pte_dirty(pte))
>> + return ERROR_ADDR;
>> +
>> + if (!pte_young(pte))
>> + return ERROR_ADDR;
>> +
>> + if (!shift)
>> + shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + /* Put huge pages handling to the virtual mode */
>> + if (shift> PAGE_SHIFT)
>> + return ERROR_ADDR;
>> +
>> + *pg = realmode_pfn_to_page(pte_pfn(pte));
>> + if (!*pg || realmode_get_page(*pg))
>> + return ERROR_ADDR;
>> +
>> + /* pte_pfn(pte) returns address aligned to pg_size */
>> + hpa = (pte_pfn(pte)<< PAGE_SHIFT) + (gpa& ((1<< shift) - 1));
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(pte_val(pte) != pte_val(*ptep))) {
>> + hpa = ERROR_ADDR;
>> + realmode_put_page(*pg);
>> + *pg = NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return hpa;
>> +}
>> +
>> long kvmppc_h_put_tce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long liobn,
>> unsigned long ioba, unsigned long tce)
>> {
>> - struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> - struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *stt;
>> -
>> - /* udbg_printf("H_PUT_TCE(): liobn=0x%lx ioba=0x%lx, tce=0x%lx\n", */
>> - /* liobn, ioba, tce); */
>> -
>> - list_for_each_entry(stt,&kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables, list) {
>> - if (stt->liobn == liobn) {
>> - unsigned long idx = ioba>> SPAPR_TCE_SHIFT;
>> - struct page *page;
>> - u64 *tbl;
>> -
>> - /* udbg_printf("H_PUT_TCE: liobn 0x%lx => stt=%p
>> window_size=0x%x\n", */
>> - /* liobn, stt, stt->window_size); */
>> - if (ioba>= stt->window_size)
>> - return H_PARAMETER;
>> -
>> - page = stt->pages[idx / TCES_PER_PAGE];
>> - tbl = (u64 *)page_address(page);
>> -
>> - /* FIXME: Need to validate the TCE itself */
>> - /* udbg_printf("tce @ %p\n",&tbl[idx % TCES_PER_PAGE]); */
>> - tbl[idx % TCES_PER_PAGE] = tce;
>> - return H_SUCCESS;
>> - }
>> + long ret;
>> + struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *tt = kvmppc_find_tce_table(vcpu, liobn);
>> +
>> + if (!tt)
>> + return H_TOO_HARD;
>> +
>> + ++tt->stat.rm.put;
>> +
>> + if (ioba>= tt->window_size)
>> + return H_PARAMETER;
>> +
>> + ret = kvmppc_emulated_validate_tce(tce);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + kvmppc_emulated_put_tce(tt, ioba, tce);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +long kvmppc_h_put_tce_indirect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> So the _vm version is the normal one and this is the _rm version? If so,
> please mark it as such. Is there any way to generate both from the same
> source? The way it's now there is a lot of duplicate code.
I tried, looked very ugly. If you insist, I will do so.
--
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists