[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokbo+X5bEYweBuSqr5bkdRsb-XHT7SrMWybwAvkfDsGBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:09:53 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3.10 regression] deadlock on cpu hotplug
On 10 July 2013 09:42, Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what is supposed after notify CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP event, if it
> is in order to stop queued work and prevent follow work happen again,
> then it failed to, and we need some method to stop queue work again when
> CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP notified, like some flag in policy which will be
> checked before re-queue work in work.
>
> But if the event is just to sync the queued work but not prevent follow
> work happen, then things will become tough...we need confirm.
After GOV_STOP, until the time GOV_START is called, we shouldn't be
queuing any work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists