[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130711065807.GA26495@concordia>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:58:08 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
Runzhen Wang <runzhen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf tools: Make Power7 events available for perf
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:42:31AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Exactly - PMUs enumerated in /sys should be self-identifying, it's a
> > hardware topology after all ...
> >
> > Anytime userspace is forced to look into /proc, or into weird places in
> > /sys it's a FAIL really.
>
> well on x86 you have to look at /proc/cpuinfo to get the
> vendor/family/model number. Should we add some specifier under sys?
> It's probably too late though as all userspace event libs will have
> to look at /proc/cpuinfo anyway to be backwards compatible.
If it's a new library implementing a new feature then no I don't think
it needs to be backward compatible. It's just a choice the library makes
as to what extent it depends on new kernel features.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists