lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130711074153.GB5895@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:41:53 +0300
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: reset arch memslot info on memslot creation

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:49:56PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:24:39 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On x86, kvm_arch_create_memslot assumes that rmap/lpage_info for the
> > slot are zeroed out: if they weren't, error handling code after out_free
> > label will free memory which wasn't allocated here.
> > This always happens to be the case because on KVM_MR_DELETE we clear the
> > whole arch structure.  So there's no bug, but it's cleaner not to rely
> > on this here.
> 
> Yes, the assumption is that the function is called only with zero-sized slots.
> Since changing the size is not allowed, DELETE-CREATE is the only case we
> care about.
> 
> But isn't it possible to make it explicit that zero-sized slots have always
> zero-cleared contents instead?  Otherwise, there would be many troubles.
> 
Do you have something in mind?

> 	Takuya
> 
> > 
> > Make the code more robust by clearing the rmap/lpage_info explicitly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index e8ba99c..96e6eb4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -6922,6 +6922,10 @@ int kvm_arch_create_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long npages)
> >  {
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > +	/* Reset in case slot had some rmap/lpage_info. */
> > +	memset(&slot->arch.rmap, 0, sizeof slot->arch.rmap);
> > +	memset(&slot->arch.lpage_info, 0, sizeof slot->arch.lpage_info);
> > +
> >  	for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
> >  		unsigned long ugfn;
> >  		int lpages;
> > -- 
> > MST
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> -- 
> Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ