lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:30:38 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once
 selected

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> @@ -829,10 +854,29 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Update the tasks preferred node if necessary */
> +	/*
> +	 * Record the preferred node as the node with the most faults,
> +	 * requeue the task to be running on the idlest CPU on the
> +	 * preferred node and reset the scanning rate to recheck
> +	 * the working set placement.
> +	 */
>  	if (max_faults && max_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid) {
> +		int preferred_cpu;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the task is not on the preferred node then find the most
> +		 * idle CPU to migrate to.
> +		 */
> +		preferred_cpu = task_cpu(p);
> +		if (cpu_to_node(preferred_cpu) != max_nid) {
> +			preferred_cpu = find_idlest_cpu_node(preferred_cpu,
> +							     max_nid);
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Update the preferred nid and migrate task if possible */
>  		p->numa_preferred_nid = max_nid;
>  		p->numa_migrate_seq = 0;
> +		migrate_task_to(p, preferred_cpu);
>  	}
>  }

Now what happens if the migrations fails? We set numa_preferred_nid to max_nid
but then never re-try the migration. Should we not re-try the migration every
so often, regardless of whether max_nid changed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ