[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4133424D-B105-4CB1-A72A-4F47A6184DC7@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:51:20 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] KVM: PPC: Add support for multiple-TCE hcalls
On 11.07.2013, at 14:39, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:15 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> And that's bad. Jeez, seriously. Don't argue this case. We enable new
>> features individually unless we're 100% sure we can keep everything
>> working. In this case an ENABLE_CAP doesn't hurt at all, because user
>> space still needs to handle the hypercalls if it wants them anyways.
>> But you get debugging for free for example.
>
> An ENABLE_CAP is utterly pointless. More bloat. But you seem to like
> it :-)
I don't like bloat usually. But Alexey even had an #ifdef DEBUG in there to selectively disable in-kernel handling of multi-TCE. Not calling ENABLE_CAP would give him exactly that without ugly #ifdefs in the kernel.
Alex
>
> Ben.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists