lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DEB102.7060802@citrix.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:20:02 +0100
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@...rix.com>
CC:	<xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/4] xen-blkfront: improve aproximation
 of	required grants per request

On 08/07/13 14:03, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Improve the calculation of required grants to process a request by
> using nr_phys_segments instead of always assuming a request is going
> to use all posible segments.

This isn't obviously correct to me.  Why is this correct value for the
number of pages that need to be granted?

David

> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -400,10 +400,13 @@ static int blkif_queue_request(struct request *req)
>  	if (unlikely(info->connected != BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED))
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	max_grefs = info->max_indirect_segments ?
> -		    info->max_indirect_segments +
> -		    INDIRECT_GREFS(info->max_indirect_segments) :
> -		    BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST;
> +	max_grefs = req->nr_phys_segments;
> +	if (max_grefs > BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST)
> +		/*
> +		 * If we are using indirect segments we need to account
> +		 * for the indirect grefs used in the request.
> +		 */
> +		max_grefs += INDIRECT_GREFS(req->nr_phys_segments);
>  
>  	/* Check if we have enough grants to allocate a requests */
>  	if (info->persistent_gnts_c < max_grefs) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ