lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:51:30 +0200
From:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Bluetooth: hidp: remove wrong send_report at init

Hi

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> wrote:
> The USB hid implementation does retrieve the reports during the start.
> However, this implementation does not call the HID command GET_REPORT
> (which would fetch the current status of each report), but use the
> DATA command, which is an Output Report (so transmitting data from the
> host to the device).
> The Wiimote controller is already guarded against this problem in the
> protocol, but it is not conformant to the specification to set all the
> reports to 0 on start.

I always wondered whether report-setup is really needed for BT-HIDP.
The BT profile doesn't mention it but I thought it was part of the
USBHID core specification.
During hid-wiimote development I added support for
HID_QUIRK_NO_INIT_REPORTS to HIDP to silence the wiimote errors. But
if you say that it's specific to USBHID, I am fine with this. I never
read the USBHID specs, though, I rely on your comment here.

Anyway, code looks good:
  Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>

Thanks!
David

> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> ---
>  net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c | 14 --------------
>  1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c b/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
> index 9c8b50d..59d132a 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
> @@ -703,20 +703,6 @@ static int hidp_parse(struct hid_device *hid)
>
>  static int hidp_start(struct hid_device *hid)
>  {
> -       struct hidp_session *session = hid->driver_data;
> -       struct hid_report *report;
> -
> -       if (hid->quirks & HID_QUIRK_NO_INIT_REPORTS)
> -               return 0;
> -
> -       list_for_each_entry(report, &hid->report_enum[HID_INPUT_REPORT].
> -                       report_list, list)
> -               hidp_send_report(session, report);
> -
> -       list_for_each_entry(report, &hid->report_enum[HID_FEATURE_REPORT].
> -                       report_list, list)
> -               hidp_send_report(session, report);
> -
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ