[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DE0073.3020403@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:46:43 +0800
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, eranian@...gle.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Update event buffer tail when overwriting old events
On 07/10/2013 07:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:37:43PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On 07/08/2013 08:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:58:06PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>>> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
>
>>>> before overwrite mode after overwrite mode
>>>> AVG 1000 999 1046 1044
>>>> STDEV 19.4 19.5 17.1 17.9
>>>
>>> OK, so I was sure I replied to this email; but apparently I didn't :/
>>>
>>> So its still adding about 5% overhead to the regular case; this is sad.
>>>
>>> What does something like the below do?
>>>
>>
>> I re-test the patch on a different 32 core sandybridge-ep machine. the result is quite good.
>>
>> origin origin overwrite modified modified overwrite
>> AVG 1000 1044 960 1006
>> STDEV 39.0 26.0 28.1 14.4
>
> Nice! -- you did fix the snafu for the overwrite more before testing right?
>
yes, of course.
Regards
Yan, Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists