[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130711140914.GE2355@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:09:14 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once
selected
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:11:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:03:22PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:30:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > @@ -829,10 +854,29 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - /* Update the tasks preferred node if necessary */
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Record the preferred node as the node with the most faults,
> > > > + * requeue the task to be running on the idlest CPU on the
> > > > + * preferred node and reset the scanning rate to recheck
> > > > + * the working set placement.
> > > > + */
> > > > if (max_faults && max_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid) {
> > > > + int preferred_cpu;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * If the task is not on the preferred node then find the most
> > > > + * idle CPU to migrate to.
> > > > + */
> > > > + preferred_cpu = task_cpu(p);
> > > > + if (cpu_to_node(preferred_cpu) != max_nid) {
> > > > + preferred_cpu = find_idlest_cpu_node(preferred_cpu,
> > > > + max_nid);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Update the preferred nid and migrate task if possible */
> > > > p->numa_preferred_nid = max_nid;
> > > > p->numa_migrate_seq = 0;
> > > > + migrate_task_to(p, preferred_cpu);
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Now what happens if the migrations fails? We set numa_preferred_nid to max_nid
> > > but then never re-try the migration. Should we not re-try the migration every
> > > so often, regardless of whether max_nid changed?
> >
> > We do this
> >
> > load_balance
> > -> active_load_balance_cpu_stop
>
> Note that active balance is rare to begin with.
>
Yeah. I was not sure how rare exactly but it is what motivated the
introduction of migrate_task_to in the first place. I actually have no
idea how often the migration fails. I did not check for it.
> > -> move_one_task
> > -> can_migrate_task
> > -> migrate_improves_locality
> >
> > If the conditions are right then it'll move the task to the preferred node
> > for a number of PTE scans. Of course there is no guarantee that the necessary
> > conditions will occur but I was wary of taking more drastic steps in the
> > scheduler such as retrying on every fault until the migration succeeds.
> >
>
> Ah, so task_numa_placement() is only called every full scan, not every fault.
> Also one could throttle it.
>
> So initially I did all the movement through the regular balancer, but Ingo
> found that when the machine grows it quickly becomes unlikely we hit the right
> conditions. Hence he also went to direct migrations in his series.
>
I wanted to avoid aggressive scheduling decisions until after the false
share detection stuff was solid.
> Another thing we might consider is counting the number of migration attempts
> and settling for the n-th best node for the n'th attempt and giving up when n
> surpasses the quality of the node we're currently on.
That might be necessary when the machine is overloaded. As a
starting point the following should retry the migrate a number of times
until success. The retry is checked on every fault but should not fire
more than once every 100ms.
Compile tested only
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index d44fbc6..454ad2e 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1505,6 +1505,7 @@ struct task_struct {
int numa_migrate_seq;
unsigned int numa_scan_period;
unsigned int numa_scan_period_max;
+ unsigned long numa_migrate_retry;
u64 node_stamp; /* migration stamp */
struct callback_head numa_work;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f2b37e01..a5b6b01 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -934,6 +934,20 @@ static inline int task_faults_idx(int nid, int priv)
return 2 * nid + priv;
}
+/* Attempt to migrate a task to a CPU on the preferred node */
+static void numa_migrate_preferred(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ int preferred_cpu = task_cpu(p);
+
+ p->numa_migrate_retry = 0;
+ if (cpu_to_node(preferred_cpu) != p->numa_preferred_nid) {
+ preferred_cpu = task_numa_find_cpu(p, p->numa_preferred_nid);
+
+ if (!migrate_task_to(p, preferred_cpu))
+ p->numa_migrate_retry = jiffies + HZ/10;
+ }
+}
+
static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
{
int seq, nid, max_nid = -1;
@@ -975,21 +989,12 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
* the working set placement.
*/
if (max_faults && max_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid) {
- int preferred_cpu;
int old_migrate_seq = p->numa_migrate_seq;
- /*
- * If the task is not on the preferred node then find
- * a suitable CPU to migrate to.
- */
- preferred_cpu = task_cpu(p);
- if (cpu_to_node(preferred_cpu) != max_nid)
- preferred_cpu = task_numa_find_cpu(p, max_nid);
-
/* Update the preferred nid and migrate task if possible */
p->numa_preferred_nid = max_nid;
p->numa_migrate_seq = 0;
- migrate_task_to(p, preferred_cpu);
+ numa_migrate_preferred(p);
/*
* If preferred nodes changes frequently then the scan rate
@@ -1050,6 +1055,10 @@ void task_numa_fault(int last_nidpid, int node, int pages, bool migrated)
task_numa_placement(p);
+ /* Retry task to preferred node migration if it previously failed */
+ if (p->numa_migrate_retry && time_after(jiffies, p->numa_migrate_retry))
+ numa_migrate_preferred(p);
+
/* Record the fault, double the weight if pages were migrated */
p->numa_faults_buffer[task_faults_idx(node, priv)] += pages << migrated;
}
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists