linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/98] zram: avoid access beyond the zram device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1373552708-15235-6-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:23:35 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/98] zram: avoid access beyond the zram device

3.5.7.17 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>

commit 12a7ad3b810e77137d0caf97a6dd97591e075b30 upstream.

Function valid_io_request() should verify the entire request are within
the zram device address range. Otherwise it may cause invalid memory
access when accessing/modifying zram->meta->table[index] because the
'index' is out of range. Then it may access non-exist memory, randomly
modify memory belong to other subsystems, which is hard to track down.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
index 6b1e443..1ae0610 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -533,13 +533,20 @@ out:
  */
 static inline int valid_io_request(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
 {
-	if (unlikely(
-		(bio->bi_sector >= (zram->disksize >> SECTOR_SHIFT)) ||
-		(bio->bi_sector & (ZRAM_SECTOR_PER_LOGICAL_BLOCK - 1)) ||
-		(bio->bi_size & (ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE - 1)))) {
+	u64 start, end, bound;
+	
+	/* unaligned request */
+	if (unlikely(bio->bi_sector & (ZRAM_SECTOR_PER_LOGICAL_BLOCK - 1)))
+		return 0;
+	if (unlikely(bio->bi_size & (ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE - 1)))
+		return 0;
 
+	start = bio->bi_sector;
+	end = start + (bio->bi_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
+	bound = zram->disksize >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+	/* out of range range */
+	if (unlikely(start >= bound || end >= bound || start > end))
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	/* I/O request is valid */
 	return 1;
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/