[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130711154121.GC2198@dhcp-172-17-186-34.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:41:22 -0700
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc: 'Bjorn Helgaas' <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
'Kukjin Kim' <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...com>,
Mohit KUMAR <Mohit.KUMAR@...com>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
'Sean Cross' <xobs@...agi.com>,
'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@...com>,
'SRIKANTH TUMKUR SHIVANAND' <ts.srikanth@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] pci: exynos: split into two parts such as Synopsys
part and Exynos part
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:49:43PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
[...]
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MVEBU) += pci-mvebu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW) += pcie-designware.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_EXYNOS) += pcie-exynos.o
I think we should keep these sorted alphabetically. Also Tegra and
Marvell are PCIe controllers but they still use the pci- prefix instead
of pcie-. Perhaps it'd be good to keep consistency here? I initially
chose pci- because from a software point of view it doesn't matter all
that much whether it's PCI or PCIe and because the drivers are part of
the PCI subsystem. However if Exynos now uses the pcie- prefix it makes
it look like Tegra and Marvell are plain old PCI.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists