linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] [RFC] usb: gadget: USB_GADGET should depend on HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1307111145160.1276-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:51:09 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] [RFC] usb: gadget: USB_GADGET should depend on
 HAS_DMA

On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> If NO_DMA=y:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `dma_set_coherent_mask':
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h:93: undefined reference to `dma_supported'
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h:93: undefined reference to `dma_supported'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `usb_gadget_unmap_request':
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:91: undefined reference to `dma_unmap_sg'
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:96: undefined reference to `dma_unmap_single'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `usb_gadget_map_request':
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:62: undefined reference to `dma_map_sg'
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:71: undefined reference to `dma_map_single'
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c:74: undefined reference to `dma_mapping_error'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> ---
> This one is very debatable: probably the parts using the DMA API should
> be factored out, instead of disabling the whole USB gadget subsystem.

Indeed.  How does this look instead?

Alan Stern



Index: usb-3.10/drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c
===================================================================
--- usb-3.10.orig/drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c
+++ usb-3.10/drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(udc_lock);
 
 /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
 
+#ifdef	CONFIG_HAS_DMA
+
 int usb_gadget_map_request(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
 		struct usb_request *req, int is_in)
 {
@@ -99,6 +101,8 @@ void usb_gadget_unmap_request(struct usb
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_gadget_unmap_request);
 
+#endif	/* CONFIG_HAS_DMA */
+
 /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
 
 void usb_gadget_set_state(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
@@ -194,9 +198,11 @@ int usb_add_gadget_udc_release(struct de
 	dev_set_name(&gadget->dev, "gadget");
 	gadget->dev.parent = parent;
 
+#ifdef	CONFIG_HAS_DMA
 	dma_set_coherent_mask(&gadget->dev, parent->coherent_dma_mask);
 	gadget->dev.dma_parms = parent->dma_parms;
 	gadget->dev.dma_mask = parent->dma_mask;
+#endif
 
 	if (release)
 		gadget->dev.release = release;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/