[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DEDC10.3020702@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:23:44 +0200
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/4] xen-gnt: prevent adding duplicate
gnt callbacks
On 11/07/13 15:17, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 08/07/13 14:03, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> With the current implementation, the callback in the tail of the list
>> can be added twice, because the check done in
>> gnttab_request_free_callback is bogus, callback->next can be NULL if
>> it is the last callback in the list. If we add the same callback twice
>> we end up with an infinite loop, were callback == callback->next.
>>
>> Replace this check with a proper one that iterates over the list to
>> see if the callback has already been added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/xen/grant-table.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c b/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
>> index 04c1b2d..d5418c1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
>> @@ -729,9 +729,18 @@ void gnttab_request_free_callback(struct gnttab_free_callback *callback,
>> void (*fn)(void *), void *arg, u16 count)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> + struct gnttab_free_callback *cb;
>> +
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&gnttab_list_lock, flags);
>> - if (callback->next)
>> - goto out;
>> +
>> + /* Check if the callback is already on the list */
>> + cb = gnttab_free_callback_list;
>> + while (cb) {
>> + if (cb == callback)
>> + goto out;
>> + cb = cb->next;
>> + }
>
> O(N)?
IMHO we should not worry _that_ much about having a O(N) search here,
the number of elements in the list is probably going to be quite low (5,
maybe 10?). That doesn't mean I oppose to changing the free callback
list code.
> Suggest using the standard list infrastructure, or using something other
> than NULL for the end of the list (e.g., gnttab_free_callback_list).
>
> gnttab_request_free_callback() is also putting the callbacks in the
> wrong order -- it should be FIFO not LIFO. Might be nice to fix this as
> well.
Agree, all this free callback list mechanism is pretty ad-hoc, we should
use one of the list types provided by Linux, so bugs like the one I've
found can be avoided and we can use a FIFO list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists