[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DE1A35.2030108@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:36:37 +0800
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafael <rjw@...k.pl>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: introduce PCIe Device Serial NUmber Capability
support
>> + */
>> +void pci_get_dsn(struct pci_dev *dev, u64 *sn)
>
> How about:
>
> u64 pci_device_serial_number(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> "get" suggests reference counting, which isn't happening here. And
> why pass a pointer to a return value when we can just as easily return
> it directly?
Yes, u64 pci_device_serial_number(struct pci_dev *dev) is better, thanks!
>
id pci_init_capabilities(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> /* Power Management */
>> pci_pm_init(dev);
>>
>> + /* Device Serial Number */
>> + pci_dsn_init(dev);
>
> dev->sn = pci_serial_number(dev);
>
> Obvious, no comment or wrapper function needed.
OK, will remove the unnecessary comment.
>
>> +
>> /* Vital Product Data */
>> pci_vpd_pci22_init(dev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists