[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65F5F98566038744B1B43C8FD3B7549F1BED3B7B@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:25:35 +0000
From: "Jarzmik, Robert" <robert.jarzmik@...el.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"toralf.foerster@....de" <toralf.foerster@....de>,
"R, Durgadoss" <durgadoss.r@...el.com>,
"Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
"lantianyu1986@...il.com" <lantianyu1986@...il.com>,
"dirk.brandewie@...il.com" <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
CC: "stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/8] Cpufreq, cpu hotplug, suspend/resume related fixes
-----Original Message-----
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat [mailto:srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 00:15
> Robert, Durgadoss, it would be great if you could try it out and
> see if it works well for your usecase. I tested it locally and
> cpufreq related files did retain their permissions across
> suspend/resume. Let me know if it works fine in your setup too.
Sure, I'll check for Monday last delay, if that's not too late for you, as I'm a bit in a hurry right now, but I'll give it a try in the WE I think.
Cheers.
--
Robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation SAS (French simplified joint stock company)
Registered headquarters: "Les Montalets"- 2, rue de Paris,
92196 Meudon Cedex, France
Registration Number: 302 456 199 R.C.S. NANTERRE
Capital: 4,572,000 Euros
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists