[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DF44FA.9060000@asianux.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:51:22 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: trace: remove __init from race_selftest_startup_function()
and trace_selftest_startup_function_graph()
On 07/12/2013 12:47 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 08:31 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Like other trace_selftest_startup_*, trace_selftest_startup_function()
>> and trace_selftest_startup_function_graph() need in normal section, or
>> may cause section mismatch.
>>
>> The related warnings:
>>
>> LD kernel/trace/built-in.o
>> WARNING: kernel/trace/built-in.o(.data+0x154c): Section mismatch in reference from the variable function_trace to the function .init.text:trace_selftest_startup_function()
>> The variable function_trace references
>> the function __init trace_selftest_startup_function()
>> If the reference is valid then annotate the
>> variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
>> *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console
>>
>
> No the fix is to add ref_data to the user. The selftest are only called
> at boot up. No need to waste memory keeping them around.
>
Ok, thanks.
Hmm, can all trace_selftest_startup_* (*selftest* in trace_selftest.c)
use '__init', so not waste memory keeping them around ?
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists