linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130712162241.08c8dd775abd0d6792b4927b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:22:41 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog - v3.11-rc1

Hi Wim,

On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:34:24 +0200 Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be> wrote:
>
> Please pull from 'master' branch of
> 	git://www.linux-watchdog.org/linux-watchdog.git

This was all rebased in the last day from what has been in linux-next for
some time.  All the patches are the same, so the rebase achieved nothing
positive at all.  Please don't do this (see I am still much nicer than
Linus :-)).  Just submit what you have in linux-next which has already
been tested (presumably) and Linus can fix up any conflicts (in this case
there were nothing significant anyway).

Also, you might like to consider using "git request-pull" to generate a
starting place for your pull request rather than sending all the commit
messages and the diff in line.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped