[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130712084712.GD24008@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:47:12 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Nate Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale-asia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: boot tracing
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Robert Richter and Boris Petkov are working on 'persistent events'
> support for perf, which will eventually allow boot time profiling -
> I'm not sure if the patches and the tooling support is ready enough
> yet for your purposes.
Nope, not yet but we're getting there.
> Robert, Boris, the following workflow would be pretty intuitive:
>
> - kernel developer sets boot flag: perf=boot,freq=1khz,size=16MB
What does perf=boot mean? I assume boot tracing.
If so, does it mean we want to enable *all* tracepoints and collect
whatever hits us?
What makes more sense to me is to hijack what the function tracer does -
i.e. simply collect all function calls.
> - we'd get a single (cycles?) event running once the perf subsystem is up
> and running, with a sampling frequency of 1 KHz, sending profiling
> trace events to a sufficiently sized profiling buffer of 16 MB per
> CPU.
Right, what would those trace events be?
> - once the system reaches SYSTEM_RUNNING, profiling is stopped either
> automatically - or the user stops it via a new tooling command.
Ok.
> - the profiling buffer is extracted into a regular perf.data via a
> special 'perf record' call or some other, new perf tooling
> solution/variant.
>
> [ Alternatively the kernel could attempt to construct a 'virtual'
> perf.data from the persistent buffer, available via /sys/debug or
> elsewhere in /sys - just like the kernel constructs a 'virtual'
> /proc/kcore, etc. That file could be copied or used directly. ]
Yeah, that.
> - from that point on this workflow joins the regular profiling workflow:
> perf report, perf script et al can be used to analyze the resulting
> boot profile.
Agreed.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists