[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130712091123.GD24370@lukather>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:11:23 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, jimwall@...om, brian@...stalfontz.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fb: backlight: HX8357: Make IM pins optionnal
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:50:15PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > };
> > >
> > > static u8 hx8357_seq_power[] = {
> > > @@ -250,9 +251,11 @@ static int hx8357_lcd_init(struct lcd_device *lcdev)
> > > * Set the interface selection pins to SPI mode, with three
> > > * wires
> > > */
> > > - gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[0], 1);
> > > - gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[1], 0);
> > > - gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[2], 1);
> > > + if (lcd->use_im_pins) {
> > > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[0], 1);
> > > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[1], 0);
> > > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[2], 1);
> > > + }
> >
> > base on the dt probe you may have gpios betwee 0 to HX8357_NUM_IM_PINS
> >
> > so this look wrong
>
> How so?
>
> HX8357_NUM_IM_PINS is defined to 3, the probe checks to see if we
> actually have HX8357_NUM_IM_PINS, otherwise returns an error, what is
> wrong in setting these pins here?
Ping?
I'd really like to get this merged, could you clarify what you want?
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists