linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] dts: change Marvell prefix to 'marvell'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:10:49 -0600
From:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
To:	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>
Cc:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Bergmann Arnd <arnd@...db.de>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Neil Zhang <zhangwm@...vell.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] dts: change Marvell prefix to 'marvell'

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Haojian Zhuang
<haojian.zhuang@...il.com> wrote:
>> Well, Daniel Drake spoke up for OLPC.  Does that count?
>
> We don't know they used DT on Marvell MMP2/MMP3. So they don't have DTS file
> in kernel, we could use both old name & new name in driver.

You are listed as one of the MMP maintainers in the MAINTAINERS file
and I have sent you several patches in the few 3 weeks which make
OLPC's usage of MMP + DT pretty obvious. As a maintainer I believe you
are supposed to review the patches too. hint hint ;)

My request to avoid breaking compatibility actually comes as a
two-prong request.

I would prefer to see these compatible properties stay the same as it
seems like changing them has little purpose/benefit - and there *will*
become a later point where changing them causes major breakage.

At the same time I see that there have been recent efforts to remove
MMP2 platform code and make it entirely DT-driven, which could also
generate some compatibility concerns. However, such movements are much
appreciated and I think they will become increasingly necessary as we
bring up the devices on the MMP3 SoC to a fuller extent, so please
continue :) I would not want to discourage you from breaking
compatibility when *that* type of work needs to be done.

So: breaking compatibility is actually OK from my standpoint, but only
for now (while we stabilise), and I would advise/appreciate that it
only be done in cases where there is a clear purpose and benefit.

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/