lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1373644343-6671-3-git-send-email-jvesely@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:52:23 +0200
From:	Jan Vesely <jvesely@...hat.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>,
	Rob Evers <revers@...hat.com>, Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com>,
	Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@...hat.com>,
	Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@...umbus.fi>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Don Howard <dhoward@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] block: modify __bio_add_page check to accept pages that don't start a new segment

From: Jan Vesely <jvesely@...hat.com>

The original behavior was to refuse all pages after the maximum number of
segments has been reached. However, some drivers (like st) craft their buffers
to potentially require exactly max segments and multiple pages in the last
segment. This patch modifies the check to allow pages that can be merged into
the last segment.

Fixes EBUSY failures when using large tape block size in high
memory fragmentation condition. This regression was introduced by commit
46081b166415acb66d4b3150ecefcd9460bb48a1
st: Increase success probability in driver buffer allocation

Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jvesely@...hat.com>

CC: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
CC: Rob Evers <revers@...hat.com>
CC: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com>
CC: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@...hat.com>
CC: Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@...umbus.fi>
CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
---
 fs/bio.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
index 94bbc04..ba64e99 100644
--- a/fs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/bio.c
@@ -603,7 +603,6 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
 			  *page, unsigned int len, unsigned int offset,
 			  unsigned short max_sectors)
 {
-	int retried_segments = 0;
 	struct bio_vec *bvec;
 
 	/*
@@ -654,18 +653,12 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * we might lose a segment or two here, but rather that than
-	 * make this too complex.
+	 * The first part of the segment count check,
+	 * reduce segment count if possible
 	 */
-
-	while (bio->bi_phys_segments >= queue_max_segments(q)) {
-
-		if (retried_segments)
-			return 0;
-
-		retried_segments = 1;
+	if (bio->bi_phys_segments >= queue_max_segments(q))
 		blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
-	}
+
 
 	/*
 	 * setup the new entry, we might clear it again later if we
@@ -677,6 +670,21 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
 	bvec->bv_offset = offset;
 
 	/*
+	 * the other part of the segment count check, allow mergeable pages.
+	 * BIO_SEG_VALID flag is cleared below
+	 */
+	if ((bio->bi_phys_segments > queue_max_segments(q)) ||
+	    ((bio->bi_phys_segments == queue_max_segments(q)) &&
+	     !bvec_mergeable(q, __BVEC_END(bio), bvec,
+			     bio->bi_seg_back_size))) {
+			bvec->bv_page = NULL;
+			bvec->bv_len = 0;
+			bvec->bv_offset = 0;
+			return 0;
+	}
+
+
+	/*
 	 * if queue has other restrictions (eg varying max sector size
 	 * depending on offset), it can specify a merge_bvec_fn in the
 	 * queue to get further control
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ