[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DF52D4.20500@hitachi.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:50:28 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86: introduce int3-based instruction patching
(2013/07/11 19:51), Jiri Kosina wrote:
>>> + * - update all but the first byte of the patched range
>>> + * - sync cores
>>> + * - replalace the first byte (int3) by the first byte of
>>> + * replacing opcode
>>> + * - sync cores
>>> + *
>>> + * Note: must be called under text_mutex.
>>> + */
>>> +void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned char int3 = 0xcc;
>>> +
>>
>> Here, you have to protect this code from others, since bp_* are
>> global.
>
> Caller is responsible for holding the text_mutex, so text_poke_bp() can't
> race with itself. And the proper consistency between text_poke_bp() and
> the notifier is achieved by the memory barriers.
Oops, right. I missed your "Note" line
>
> So what exact scenario do you have in mind here, please?
No, never mind...
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists