linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130712172932.GB7627@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:29:32 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 05:20:29PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 04:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.1 release.
> > There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat Jul 13 21:45:35 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.1-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> 
> Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.85, 3.4.52, 3.9.9, and 3.10
> 
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
> 
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5:
>      (3.4.53-rc1, 3.9.10-rc1, 3.10.1-rc1)
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics:
>      (3.0.86-rc1, 3.4.53-rc1, 3.9.10-rc1, and 3.10.1-rc1)
> 
> dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the previous
> dmesgs for each of these releases. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean.
> No regressions in warn.
> 
> Cross-compile testing:
> HP Compaq dc7700 SFF desktop: x86-64 Intel Core-i2:
>      (3.0.86-rc1, 3.4.53-rc1, 3.9.10-rc1, and 3.10.1-rc1)

Great, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/