[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130711221539.GA10973@amt.cnet>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:15:39 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
glommer@...allels.com, tglx@...utronix.de, jeremy@...p.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove sched notifier for cross-cpu migrations
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:10:25AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:21:57PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > Linux as a guest on KVM hypervisor, the only user of the pvclock
> > vsyscall interface, does not require notification on task migration
> > because:
> >
> > 1. cpu ID number maps 1:1 to per-CPU pvclock time info.
> > 2. per-CPU pvclock time info is updated if the
> > underlying CPU changes.
> > 3. that version is increased whenever underlying CPU
> > changes.
> >
> Is this the case with KVM though? IIRC KVM does not updates kvmclock
> on vcpu migration if host has synchronized TSC.
KVM does not update kvmclock on vcpu->pcpu migration if the
master clock scheme is used, which depends on synchronized TSC.
In that case, it is safe to migrate a thread/vcpu to another cpu without
updating kvmclock area (because all vcpus contain the same value as
system timestamp and different tsc_timestamps, but all (tsc_timestamps)
usable as deltas on any given pcpu.
So the 3 items are necessary in the general case of hypervisor
maintaining distinct kvmclock vcpu areas (copy&pasted the comment from
the code comment).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists