[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DF62DB.3010409@asianux.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:58:51 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: trace: remove __init from race_selftest_startup_function()
and trace_selftest_startup_function_graph()
On 07/12/2013 09:41 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 07:51 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>
>> > Hmm, can all trace_selftest_startup_* (*selftest* in trace_selftest.c)
>> > use '__init', so not waste memory keeping them around ?
> Yeah, they should all be set to __init, but that's pretty low on the
> totem poll, as distros don't enable selftests in their main kernels.
Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I guess your meaning is:
they should all be set to '__init', although it is minor in real world.
Is it correct ?
For me, I recommend to let all *selftest* as the same: "all add '
__init' or none add '__init'" (if choose add, all report warnings).
Is it suitable to still send new related patch for it ? If so, could
you provide your suggesting choice (all add, or none add) ?
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists