lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:58:36 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>
Cc:	Dave Jones <>,,,,
Subject: Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 15:44 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > And the later in -rc we are, the more reluctant some people seem to be
> > at sending stuff. Which, for slowing things down as we go through -rc is great,
> > but not so much when people stop sending _everything_ and start thinking
> > "I'll just get it in stable in a few weeks".
> The 20 powerpc patches are proof of that.  I'm amost considering just
> not applying them at all, as obviously they weren't all that important.

Can you stop about powerpc for a minute Greg ? It's becoming tiring.... When it's
not this (seriously ? We are by FAR not the worst managed architecture around here
but you seem to pick on any opportunity, public medium, etc... to trash us for
whatever reason, time to find another axe to grind really).

Also look at the damn history. We rarely had that much stuff going back. You know
3.10 is special and you probably know why, and I've mentioned already that a lot
of that stuff you are complaining about affects HW that people do NOT have presently
access to outside of IBM.

Please, go play another violin.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists