lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 14 Jul 2013 16:48:20 +0300
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org, x86@...nel.org,
	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	mtosatti@...hat.com, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, attilio.rao@...rix.com, ouyang@...pitt.edu,
	gregkh@...e.de, agraf@...e.de, chegu_vinod@...com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, avi.kivity@...il.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stephan.diestelhorst@....com,
	riel@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V10 12/18] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM
 hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:13:04PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks
> 
> From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> kvm_hc_kick_cpu allows the calling vcpu to kick another vcpu out of halt state.
> the presence of these hypercalls is indicated to guest via
> kvm_feature_pv_unhalt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@...ibm.com>
> [Raghu: Apic related changes, folding pvunhalted into vcpu_runnable]
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h      |    5 +++++
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c                 |    3 ++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                   |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h        |    1 +
>  5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 3741c65..95702de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -503,6 +503,11 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  	 * instruction.
>  	 */
>  	bool write_fault_to_shadow_pgtable;
> +
> +	/* pv related host specific info */
> +	struct {
> +		bool pv_unhalted;
> +	} pv;
>  };
>  
>  struct kvm_lpage_info {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> index 06fdbd9..94dc8ca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #define KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF		4
>  #define KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME		5
>  #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI		6
> +#define KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT		7
>  
>  /* The last 8 bits are used to indicate how to interpret the flags field
>   * in pvclock structure. If no bits are set, all flags are ignored.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index a20ecb5..b110fe6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -413,7 +413,8 @@ static int do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>  			     (1 << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2) |
>  			     (1 << KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF) |
>  			     (1 << KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI) |
> -			     (1 << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STABLE_BIT);
> +			     (1 << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STABLE_BIT) |
> +			     (1 << KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT);
>  
>  		if (sched_info_on())
>  			entry->eax |= (1 << KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 094b5d9..f8bea30 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -5449,6 +5449,36 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op:  Kick a vcpu.
> + *
> + * @apicid - apicid of vcpu to be kicked.
> + */
> +static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, int apicid)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, 0, 0, apicid, 0))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	if (vcpu) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Setting unhalt flag here can result in spurious runnable
> +		 * state when unhalt reset does not happen in vcpu_block.
> +		 * But that is harmless since that should soon result in halt.
> +		 */
> +		vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = true;
> +		/* We need everybody see unhalt before vcpu unblocks */
> +		smp_wmb();
> +		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
> @@ -5482,6 +5512,10 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	case KVM_HC_VAPIC_POLL_IRQ:
>  		ret = 0;
>  		break;
> +	case KVM_HC_KICK_CPU:
> +		kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(vcpu->kvm, a0);
Lets make it hypercall with two parameters: 
a0 - flags
a1 - apic id of a cpu to kick

A0 have to be zero. This will make it more extensible.

> +		ret = 0;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
>  		break;
> @@ -5909,6 +5943,7 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  				kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu);
>  				switch(vcpu->arch.mp_state) {
>  				case KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED:
> +					vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = false;
>  					vcpu->arch.mp_state =
>  						KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
>  				case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE:
> @@ -6729,6 +6764,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	BUG_ON(vcpu->kvm == NULL);
>  	kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>  
> +	vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = false;
>  	vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt.ops = &emulate_ops;
>  	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm) || kvm_vcpu_is_bsp(vcpu))
>  		vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> @@ -7065,6 +7101,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		!vcpu->arch.apf.halted)
>  		|| !list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done)
>  		|| kvm_apic_has_events(vcpu)
> +		|| vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted
>  		|| atomic_read(&vcpu->arch.nmi_queued) ||
>  		(kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) &&
>  		 kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu));
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
> index cea2c5c..2841f86 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #define KVM_HC_MMU_OP			2
>  #define KVM_HC_FEATURES			3
>  #define KVM_HC_PPC_MAP_MAGIC_PAGE	4
> +#define KVM_HC_KICK_CPU			5
I wounder why hypercalls are not defined in architecture headers.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ