lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 14 Jul 2013 22:33:44 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <>
To:	Andy Walls <>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,, Oliver Neukum <>,
	Alan Stern <>,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/50] USB: cleanup spin_lock in URB->complete()

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Andy Walls <> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 17:05 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Hi,
>> As we are going to run URB->complete() in tasklet context[1][2],
> Hi,
> Please pardon my naivete, but why was it decided to use tasklets to
> defer work, as opposed to some other deferred work mechanism?
> It seems to me that getting rid of tasklets has been an objective for
> years:

We discussed the problem in the below link previously[1], Steven
and Thomas suggested to use threaded irq handler, but which
may degrade USB mass storage performance, so we have to
take tasklet now until we rewrite transport part of USB mass storage

Also the conversion[2] has avoided the tasklet spin lock problem


Ming Lei
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists