[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E2FAB3.3060409@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 21:23:31 +0200
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
CC: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3] media: OF: add video sync endpoint property
Hi Prabhakar,
On 07/12/2013 06:29 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki
> <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 07/11/2013 01:41 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c
>>>>> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c
>>>>> index aa59639..1a54530 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c
>>>>> @@ -100,6 +100,26 @@ static void v4l2_of_parse_parallel_bus(const struct
>>>>> device_node *node,
>>>>> if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "data-shift",&v))
>>>>> bus->data_shift = v;
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "video-sync",&v)) {
>>>>> + switch (v) {
>>>>> + case V4L2_MBUS_VIDEO_SEPARATE_SYNC:
>>>>> + flags |= V4L2_MBUS_VIDEO_SEPARATE_SYNC;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not convinced all those video sync types is something that really
>>>> belongs
>>>> to the flags field. In my understanding this field is supposed to hold
>>>> only
>>>> the _signal polarity_ information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ok, so there should be a function say v4l2_of_parse_signal_polarity()
>>> to get the polarity alone then.
>>
>>
>> I don't think this is required, I would just extend
>> v4l2_of_parse_parallel_bus()
>> function to also handle sync-on-green-active property.
>>
> If that is the case than I have to add a member say 'signal_polarity'
> in struct v4l2_of_bus_parallel and assign the polarity to it.
> Let me know if you are OK with it.
It probably would have been sensible to do something like this, however
I can't
see any advantage at the moment. struct v4l2_of_bus_parallel::flags
currently
holds all the polarity flags. Let's just add relevant macros for
sync-on-green
and store them in the flags field, as is done with the others.
Those V4L2_MUS_* flags are used by soc-camera to negotiate the
capabilities,
so I would rather not split them further without good reason, even though
struct v4l2_mbus_config::flags is used in those negotiation routines,
rather
than struct v4l2_of_bus_parallel::flags.
--
Thanks,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists