[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87li57j1tb.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:41:12 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] mm, hugetlb: add VM_NORESERVE check in vma_has_reserves()
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> writes:
> If we map the region with MAP_NORESERVE and MAP_SHARED,
> we can skip to check reserve counting and eventually we cannot be ensured
> to allocate a huge page in fault time.
> With following example code, you can easily find this situation.
>
> Assume 2MB, nr_hugepages = 100
>
> fd = hugetlbfs_unlinked_fd();
> if (fd < 0)
> return 1;
>
> size = 200 * MB;
> flag = MAP_SHARED;
> p = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, flag, fd, 0);
> if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> fprintf(stderr, "mmap() failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> return -1;
> }
>
> size = 2 * MB;
> flag = MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_NORESERVE;
> p = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, flag, -1, 0);
> if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> fprintf(stderr, "mmap() failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> }
> p[0] = '0';
> sleep(10);
>
> During executing sleep(10), run 'cat /proc/meminfo' on another process.
> You'll find a mentioned problem.
>
> Solution is simple. We should check VM_NORESERVE in vma_has_reserves().
> This prevent to use a pre-allocated huge page if free count is under
> the reserve count.
You have a problem with this patch, which i guess you are fixing in
patch 9. Consider two process
a) MAP_SHARED on fd
b) MAP_SHARED | MAP_NORESERVE on fd
We should allow the (b) to access the page even if VM_NORESERVE is set
and we are out of reserve space .
so may be you should rearrange the patch ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 6c1eb9b..f6a7a4e 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -464,6 +464,8 @@ void reset_vma_resv_huge_pages(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> /* Returns true if the VMA has associated reserve pages */
> static int vma_has_reserves(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_NORESERVE)
> + return 0;
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
> return 1;
> if (is_vma_resv_set(vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER))
> --
> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists