[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E4337A.7020509@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:38:02 +0200
From: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, robert.jarzmik@...el.com,
durgadoss.r@...el.com, tianyu.lan@...el.com,
lantianyu1986@...il.com, dirk.brandewie@...il.com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Cpufreq, cpu hotplug, suspend/resume related fixes
On 07/12/2013 12:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I'm going to take [1/8] for 3.11 and queue up the rest for 3.12 if people don't
> hate them. This way we'll have some more testing coverage before they reach
> the mainline hopefully.
Applied patch 1#8 on top of v3.11-rc1-8-g47188d3 passes two s2ram/wakeup
cycles fine and crashed the system at the 3rd attempt / one times just
at the 4th (blinking power led, no sysrq, ...).
Applying patch 1-8 on top of that tree differs in that way that it
crashes now the system even at the 1st attempt or at least at the 2nd
My hardware is a ThinkPad T420 with latest BIOS and a 32 bit stable
Gentoo Linux - FWIW .config attached.
--
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
View attachment ".config" of type "text/plain" (66393 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists