linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 4/4] Sparse initialization of struct page array.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:29:37 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
CC:	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale-asia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] Sparse initialization of struct page array.

On 07/15/2013 11:26 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> Is there a fairly cheap way to determine definitively that the struct
> page is not initialized?

By definition I would assume no.  The only way I can think of would be
to unmap the memory associated with the struct page in the TLB and
initialize the struct pages at trap time.

> I think this patch set can change fairly drastically if we have that.
> I think I will start working up those changes and code a heavy-handed
> check until I hear of an alternative way to cheaply check.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/