linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Route kbd LEDs through the generic LEDs layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130715190803.GG11600@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:08:03 +0200
From:	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jslaby@...e.cz,
	rpurdie@...ys.net, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Evan Broder <evan@...oder.net>,
	Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
	Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	Niels de Vos <devos@...oraproject.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...esi-usa.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Route kbd LEDs through the generic LEDs layer

Hello,

David Herrmann, le Mon 15 Jul 2013 17:03:08 +0200, a écrit :
> > @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
> >         bool "Virtual terminal" if EXPERT
> >         depends on !S390 && !UML
> >         select INPUT
> > +       select NEW_LEDS
> > +       select LEDS_CLASS
> > +       select LEDS_TRIGGERS
> > +       select INPUT_LEDS
> 
> This looks odd. Any dependency changes in the input-layer will break
> this. But I guess that's what we get for a non-recursive "select". Hmm

Yes, that's the issue.

> I also think that the macros don't really simplify this. So:
>   [VC_SHIFTLOCK] = { .name = "shiftlock", .activate =
> kbd_lockstate_trigger_activate },
> isn't much longer than:
>   DEFINE_LOCKSTATE_TRIGGER(VC_SHIFTLOCK,  "shiftlock"),

That makes it more than 80 columns, at least.

> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ledtrig_ledstate); i++)
> > +               led_trigger_register(&ledtrig_ledstate[i]);
> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ledtrig_lockstate); i++)
> > +               led_trigger_register(&ledtrig_lockstate[i]);
> > +
> 
> This returns "int", are you sure no error-handling is needed?

ATM only registering the same name several times can happen, and
shouldn't ever happen. But better warn than be sorry, indeed.

> > + * Keyboard LEDs are propagated by default like the following example:
> > + *
> > + * VT keyboard numlock trigger
> > + * -> vt::numl VT LED
> > + * -> vt-numl VT trigger
> 
> Nitpick: What's the reason for the syntax difference? "vt-numl" vs. "vt::numl"

vt::numl is a clear LED classification convention. For triggers, I don't
see a clear convention, but at least I have never seen "::", only "-".
That makes me realize that for keyboard triggers I haven't introduced a
prefix, and only used "scrollock", "numlock", etc. Perhaps
"kbd-scrollock" etc. or (in phase with LEDs), "kbd::scrollock" etc.?

Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/