[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130715140135.0f896a584fec9f7861049b64@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:01:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND] The initmpfs patches.
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:06:39 -0500 Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
> Attached, so you don't have to fish them out of:
>
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1306.3/04204.html
Too hard. Especially when I want to reply to a patch. Please resend
as a patch series in the time-honoured fashion?
> --- a/fs/ramfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ramfs/inode.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,14 @@ struct dentry *ramfs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> static struct dentry *rootfs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data)
> {
> - return mount_nodev(fs_type, flags|MS_NOUSER, data, ramfs_fill_super);
> + static int once;
> +
> + if (once)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + else
> + once++;
> +
> + return mount_nodev(fs_type, flags, data, ramfs_fill_super);
> }
The patches do this in a couple of places. The treatment of `once' is
obviously racy. Probably it is unlikely to matter in these contexts,
but it does set a poor example. And it's so trivially fixed with, for
example, test_and_set_bit() that I do think it's worth that change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists