[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E3932C.5000905@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:14:04 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 09/12] perf: make events stream always parsable
On 12/07/13 17:55, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:56:01PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> There's events where this isn't a possible location; take PERF_RECORD_MMAP for
>>> instance; the tail is the complete filename.
>>
>> PERF_RECORD_MMAP falls in the category I have called non-sample events.
>> Those events are appended with an ID sample. perf tools parses the ID
>> sample backwards from header.size. So the ID is at the last position
>> relative to header.size
>
> But why? Why make it different per PERF_RECORD type?
There have always been two formats:
1. PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE as defined by perf_output_sample()
2. everything else as defined by __perf_event__output_id_sample()
The two formats are not the same, and there is no reason for them to be.
PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE is parsed forwards, so the ID is at the first position.
ID samples are parsed backwards, so the ID is at the last position (i.e. the
first position parsed).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists