linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] video: hx8357: Make IM pins optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <003501ce81be$4a945ed0$dfbd1c70$@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:49:12 +0900
From:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To:	'Maxime Ripard' <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	'Alexandre Belloni' <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	hector.palacios@...i.com,
	'Thomas Petazzoni' <thomas@...e-electrons.com>,
	plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] video: hx8357: Make IM pins optional

On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 12:27 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> 
> The IM pins of the HX8357 controller are used to define the interface
> used to feed pixel stream to the LCD panel.
> 
> Most of the time, these pins are directly routed to either the ground or
> the VCC to set their values.
> 
> Remove the need to assign GPIOs to these pins when we are in such a case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c b/drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c
> index a0482b5..ed94796 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/hx8357.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct hx8357_data {
>  	unsigned		reset;
>  	struct spi_device	*spi;
>  	int			state;
> +	bool			use_im_pins;
>  };
> 
>  static u8 hx8357_seq_power[] = {
> @@ -250,9 +251,11 @@ static int hx8357_lcd_init(struct lcd_device *lcdev)
>  	 * Set the interface selection pins to SPI mode, with three
>  	 * wires
>  	 */
> -	gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[0], 1);
> -	gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[1], 0);
> -	gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[2], 1);
> +	if (lcd->use_im_pins) {
> +		gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[0], 1);
> +		gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[1], 0);
> +		gpio_set_value_cansleep(lcd->im_pins[2], 1);
> +	}
> 
>  	/* Reset the screen */
>  	gpio_set_value(lcd->reset, 1);
> @@ -424,26 +427,31 @@ static int hx8357_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < HX8357_NUM_IM_PINS; i++) {
> -		lcd->im_pins[i] = of_get_named_gpio(spi->dev.of_node,
> -						"im-gpios", i);
> -		if (lcd->im_pins[i] == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> -			dev_info(&spi->dev, "GPIO requested is not here yet, deferring the probe\n");
> -			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> -		}
> -		if (!gpio_is_valid(lcd->im_pins[i])) {
> -			dev_err(&spi->dev, "Missing dt property: im-gpios\n");
> -			return -EINVAL;
> +	if (of_find_property(spi->dev.of_node, "im-gpios", NULL)) {
> +		lcd->use_im_pins = 1;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < HX8357_NUM_IM_PINS; i++) {
> +			lcd->im_pins[i] = of_get_named_gpio(spi->dev.of_node,
> +							    "im-gpios", i);
> +			if (lcd->im_pins[i] == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +				dev_info(&spi->dev, "GPIO requested is not here yet, deferring the
> probe\n");
> +				return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +			}
> +			if (!gpio_is_valid(lcd->im_pins[i])) {
> +				dev_err(&spi->dev, "Missing dt property: im-gpios\n");
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
> +
> +			ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, lcd->im_pins[i],
> +						    GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "im_pins");

This makes a checkpatch warning such as 'WARNING: line over 80 characters'.
How about the following?

			ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, lcd->im_pins[i],
						GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "im_pins");

> +			if (ret) {
> +				dev_err(&spi->dev, "failed to request gpio %d: %d\n",
> +					lcd->im_pins[i], ret);
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
>  		}
> -
> -		ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, lcd->im_pins[i],
> -					GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "im_pins");
> -		if (ret) {
> -			dev_err(&spi->dev, "failed to request gpio %d: %d\n",
> -				lcd->im_pins[i], ret);
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	} else
> +		lcd->use_im_pins = 0;

According to the 'Documentation/CodingStyle', braces are necessary as below.

	} else {
		lcd->use_im_pins = 0;
	}


Others look good.
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
>  	lcdev = lcd_device_register("mxsfb", &spi->dev, lcd, &hx8357_ops);
>  	if (IS_ERR(lcdev)) {
> --
> 1.8.3.2
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/