[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130716154852.GN23818@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:48:52 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org, x86@...nel.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
attilio.rao@...rix.com, ouyang@...pitt.edu, gregkh@...e.de,
agraf@...e.de, chegu_vinod@...com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
avi.kivity@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stephan.diestelhorst@....com,
riel@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V10 15/18] kvm : Paravirtual ticketlocks support for
linux guests running on KVM hypervisor
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:02:15AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> BTW can NMI handler take spinlocks?
No -- that is, yes you can using trylock, but you still shouldn't.
> If it can what happens if NMI is
> delivered in a section protected by local_irq_save()/local_irq_restore()?
You deadlock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists