[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130716163804.GA30560@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:38:04 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] tracing/kprobes/uprobes: Fix race between
opening probe event files and deleting probe
On 07/15, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> So. As Masami pointed out, this is not enough. Probably we can add more
> hacks, but I'd like to discuss the alternative approach.
>
> Note also that this ref count has the unfortunate property, if someone
> keeps the file opened we can't remove an event.
And please correct me, but afaics there are similar problems with
rmdir instances/xxx.
> What this patch does:
>
> - add the new "topmost" rw_semaphore, file_sem.
probably unneeded...
> - trace_remove_event_call() takes this sem for writing and
> cleares enable/id/format/filter->i_private
>
> - removes tracing_open_generic_file/tracing_release_generic_file,
> we do not use file->f_private any longer
>
> - changes event_enable_read/event_enable_write to read
> ftrace_event_file = i_private under read_lock(file_sem) and
> abort if it is null.
>
> Question: why event_enable_write() needs trace_array_get() ?
probably it doesn't...
> Steven, Masami, do you think this can make any sense?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists