[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130716171324.GF24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:13:24 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] mmc: atmel-mci: prepare clk before calling
enable
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:06:48PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> @@ -389,9 +391,13 @@ static int atmci_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> * consistent.
> */
> spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
> - clk_enable(host->mck);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(host->mck);
> + if (ret) {
> + spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
> + goto out;
> + }
NAK. This is buggy. clk_prepare() can sleep. Calling clk_prepare()
even via clk_prepare_enable() is a blatent bug.
> memcpy_fromio(buf, host->regs, ATMCI_REGS_SIZE);
> - clk_disable(host->mck);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->mck);
> spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
Now, given that the CLK API counts enables/disables, having the spin lock
around the clk API calls is utterly pointless. This should be:
ret = clk_prepare_enable(host->mck);
if (ret)
goto out;
spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
memcpy_fromio(buf, host->regs, ATMCI_REGS_SIZE);
spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
clk_disable_unprepare(host->mclk);
or, if you really need to have the clock enabled/disabled within the
spinlock (very very very unlikely):
ret = clk_prepare(host->mck);
if (ret)
goto out;
spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
ret = clk_enable(host->mck);
if (ret == 0) {
memcpy_fromio(buf, host->regs, ATMCI_REGS_SIZE);
clk_disable(host->mck);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
clk_unprepare(host->mclk);
if (ret)
goto out;
> @@ -1279,7 +1286,7 @@ static void atmci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>
> spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
> if (!host->mode_reg) {
> - clk_enable(host->mck);
> + clk_prepare_enable(host->mck);
Again, buggy - calling clk_prepare beneath a spinlock is illegal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists