[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130716171940.GA2559@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:19:40 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf completion: modernize style
Em Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 06:11:28PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra escreveu:
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/bash_completion | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bash_completion b/tools/perf/bash_completion
> index d2598be..8c04f5d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/bash_completion
> +++ b/tools/perf/bash_completion
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ function_exists()
> }
>
> function_exists __ltrim_colon_completions ||
> -__ltrim_colon_completions()
> +__ltrim_colon_completions ()
Huh? Why would this be more "modern", if both are equivalent, I think
applying the same rules as we have for C code applies here.
- Arnaldo
> {
> if [[ "$1" == *:* && "$COMP_WORDBREAKS" == *:* ]]; then
> # Remove colon-word prefix from COMPREPLY items
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ __ltrim_colon_completions()
> }
>
> type perf &>/dev/null &&
> -_perf()
> +_perf ()
> {
> local cur prev cmd
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1.643.gebeea52.dirty
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists