[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWSe-M8XhFvWM3Q5P3kj6_EvUFMSvCkrDZUH7WdPPp35g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:21:58 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86: make sure IDT is page aligned
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> Since the IDT is referenced from a fixmap, make sure it is page aligned.
> Merge with 32-bit one, since it was already aligned to deal with F00F
> bug. Since bss is cleared before IDT setup, it can live there. This also
> moves the other *_idt_table variables into common locations.
>
> This avoids the risk of the IDT ever being moved in the bss and having
> the mapping be offset, resulting in calling incorrect handlers. In the
> current upstream kernel this is not a manifested bug, but heavily patched
> kernels (such as those using the PaX patch series) did encounter this bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Reported-by: PaX Team <pageexec@...il.com>
> ---
> v5:
> - add comments to all IDTs about alignment reasoning, suggested by Linus
Where is thread for that?
> v4:
> - rework using __page_aligned_bss, suggested by Yinghai LU
> - move all the other IDT variables as well, suggested by HPA
> v3:
> - merge 32-bit and 64-bit idt_table definition
> v2:
> - 32-bit was already aligned
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 15 ---------------
> arch/x86/kernel/tracepoint.c | 6 ++----
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 12 ++++++------
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> index 5e4d8a8..e1aabdb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> @@ -512,21 +512,6 @@ ENTRY(phys_base)
>
> #include "../../x86/xen/xen-head.S"
>
> - .section .bss, "aw", @nobits
> - .align L1_CACHE_BYTES
> -ENTRY(idt_table)
> - .skip IDT_ENTRIES * 16
> -
> - .align L1_CACHE_BYTES
> -ENTRY(debug_idt_table)
> - .skip IDT_ENTRIES * 16
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
> - .align L1_CACHE_BYTES
> -ENTRY(trace_idt_table)
> - .skip IDT_ENTRIES * 16
> -#endif
> -
> __PAGE_ALIGNED_BSS
> NEXT_PAGE(empty_zero_page)
> .skip PAGE_SIZE
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tracepoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tracepoint.c
> index 4e584a8..1c113db 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tracepoint.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tracepoint.c
> @@ -12,10 +12,8 @@ atomic_t trace_idt_ctr = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> struct desc_ptr trace_idt_descr = { NR_VECTORS * 16 - 1,
> (unsigned long) trace_idt_table };
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_X86_64
> -gate_desc trace_idt_table[NR_VECTORS] __page_aligned_data
> - = { { { { 0, 0 } } }, };
> -#endif
> +/* No need to be aligned, but done to keep all IDTs defined the same way. */
> +gate_desc trace_idt_table[NR_VECTORS] __page_aligned_bss;
in that case why not add __cacheline_aligned_bss?
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists