[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E5BC0D.3090303@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:33:01 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] allow some kernel filesystems to be mounted in a
user namespace
On 07/16/2013 12:50 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Al Viro (viro@...IV.linux.org.uk):
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 02:29:20PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>> All the files will be owned by host root, so there's no security
>>> concern in allowing this.
>>
>> Files owned by root != very bad things can't be done by non-root.
>> Especially for debugfs, which is very much a "don't even think about
>> mounting that on a production box" thing...
>
> I would prefer it not be mounted. But near as I can tell there
> should be no regression security-wise whether an unprivileged
> user on the host has access to it, or whether a user in a
> non-init user ns is allowed to mount it. (Obviously I could very
> well be wrong)
I would argue that either (a) debugfs denies everything to non-root, so
mounting it in a (rootless) userns is useless or (b) it doesn't, in
which case it's dangerous.
In neither case does it make sense to me to allow the mount.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists