linux-kernel - Re: [ATTEND] How to act on LKML (was: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:17:30 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [ATTEND] How to act on LKML (was: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review)

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 16:15 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>  
> One thing you should keep in mind in your discussion is what can happen
> if people get too polite with each other.
> 
> I have seen this happen at two large companies I worked for. Early on, flames
> are acceptable and expected as response to someone publishing bad code which
> breaks everything for everyone. Then, at some point, it is not acceptable
> anymore to flame, and one is expected to be polite and friendly at all times.
> "Your code breaks the build for every platform. Would you please kindly
> consider fixing it ?"
> Result is that code quality suffers, to the point where images don't even
> build anymore.
> 
> I hope the Linux kernel never gets into that stage. To avoid that,
> I am willing to be cursed at by Linus if I am the responsible party.

Didn't Jim Zemlin show some research where there were two groups:

 One that did a bunch of brain storming where no idea was a bad idea

 The other required you to defend your idea while the others bashed it.

The results always showed that the second group not only did a better
job, but also faster and more efficient.

I'm afraid if we worry too much about politeness, we will fall into that
first group.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/