linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:00:44 +0200
From:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>, l.majewski@...ess.pl,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:58:40 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@...aro.org
wrote,
> On 16 July 2013 17:36, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:11:54 +0530 Viresh Kumar
> > viresh.kumar@...aro.org wrote,
> >> On 4 July 2013 14:20, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
> >> wrote:
> 
> >> > +void cpufreq_set_boost_enabled(int state)
> >           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [*]
> >
> >>
> >> Maybe cpufreq_block_boost? As suggested by Rafael.
> >
> > What do you mean by cpufreq_block_boost()? This name would reverse
> > the logic.
> >
> > Function [*] is used to change boost_enabled static flag (defined at
> > cpufreq.c file) state according to acpi-cpufreq.c boost support
> > status.
> 
> I misread it again :(
> 
> So, what about adding another field in struct cpufreq_driver:
> boost_enabled? And get rid of the global boost_enabled we have used?
> Similar to how boost_supported is used, then we don't need this
> routine.

Ok, I will implement this.

-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/